I am a master at this.

When talking to people I give my undivided attention. I stare intently and deeply into their eyes. Only I know that I am taking in the surrounding area to see what else is going on. 

It's a gift.

Except, of course, when I am alone and walking down the street. My reflection appears out of the corner of my eye. "Who is that woman" I wonder? This full on, side view, is clearly not a good angle for anyone. Have you ever seen your favorite celeb from a side view only? Never. You get the 3/4 turn, gazing knowingly over one shoulder, a full back view, a full front view, but as I said, never profile only. Glad that's settled.

I've attended cocktail parties, art gallery openings, reunions, where there is, oh no, a clear sense that I might possibly have to yield my title of 'master of peripheral vision'. 

But, I can exhale, knowing that the true title only belongs to the person who can effortlessly effect the extrication maneuver. 

"Need a refill?" so banal. "Have to take this call," somewhat better. "I've loved you from afar" might do it, as they back away, leaving you to find your way to another group. "I knew you in a former life" works best.

But when I am talking to you, I can assure you, that you will have my undivided attention. 

"Whaddaya doing?" an innocent enough inquiry, usually.

Unless, of course you aren't doing anything. 

Which, in turn, sets off a wild mind scramble, a frantic attempt to come up with a compelling, interesting, involving, mind expanding activity, to talk about.

"Nothing much," you sheepishly reply.

This is why caller I.D. was invented. It's pretty easy to avoid the dilemma. 

Unless, of course, it is a number with an 888 preface, immediately identifying the caller as someone soliciting something, ignoring the don't call me ever ever ever edict you signed up for, and allowing you to spend a few minutes in a tirade, berating them for this breach.

Giving you, clearly, something to do.

If you flipped on the television, saw that there was a 24 hour marathon of Law and Order episodes, you'd settle in, hunker down, and see that you were able to recite, with precision and accuracy, every line ever uttered by Jack McCoy. The possibility of "whaddaya doing" now can become  "I am reciting speeches that I have committed to memory." I carefully select friends who fall into the "don't ask, don't tell" group, so I needn't expand on that statement.

Netflicks are dicey. They are premeditated sluggishness. You feel compelled to watch them. You think you should be doing something more substantitive, but there they are, calling you. I suppose, while watching one, you could be organizing the other ones you have received by genre, star power, or director, thus giving you more to do. 

Or, you can visualize all the things you would do if you were so motivated. You see, if wishing makes it so, then you have accomplished an inordinate amount. You'd be totally exhausted by all that you had done.

Good. Go take a nap, you deserve it.

 you are what you eat 3:3:10 That’s not a particularly comforting ditty, is it?

Unless of course you are sensible.

And eat only grain laden, fruits and vegetables, no sugar. Perhaps emulating a chimpanzee. Surely, you’ve never seen a chubbette, unhealthy, weight watching, Atkins following one of those, have you?

On a daily basis I reconsider my choices. Usually, I have the courage of my convictions until around 6 P.M. Then all hell breaks loose.

What to do?

I’ve already established that a mouth covered with masking tape, while an attractive option, is impractical. Unless it’s a dual effort, don’t eat and lip hair removal.

A visual. Would a visual help?

Probably not. Or at least I thought so until I read the article entitled don’t tell the kids.

Let’s say that you’ll never look dispassionately at the Easter Bunny in quite the same way, ever ever again.

What’s the definition of hypocrite? Do I sincerely believe that Elsie and her friends are led to slaughter singing kumbaya?

So, I’ve decided that going forward, I am going to only hang out with my new best friends.

He’s Tarzan, she’s Jane.

What, I wonder, could possibly attribute to the fall of our Governors?

Do you think that our elected officials are in cahoots with Dick Wolf? They give him fodder for his Law and Order franchise, he casts someone really compelling, handsome, youthful, to portray them? 

Governor Paterson, poor misguided thing, immediately upon taking office claimed that he did drugs and had an extra marital affair. Are confessions absolution? Now, ducking and parrying with the finesse of Ali, he is steadfastly holding onto his crown. Why?

We all know the sexual predilections of his predecessor. And the outfit he apparently opted from during his transgressions. 

And while he was no longer the Governor, but I think we could surmise that this wasn't his first romp, we have Nelson Rockefeller dying in a way that most of us long for, in our beds.  However, the ultimate long term sleep sedative, an orgasm, wasn't the way he thought he'd go, I imagine.

Even, way back when in 1913, a mini research project told me that William Sulzer, while keeping it in his pants, did fall victim to a vice of dipping into the campaign funds that helped elect him. Or some such thing.

New York, as we know, is not the only state that has witnessed the dance of the deranged. I think it simply holds the record. 

Whose up next? 

A reasonable campaign slogan might be "let he that has not sinned cast the first stone." Takes the pressure off, don't you think?

The Red Carpet query “who are you wearing” is no longer query enough. It’s now “turn around and let me read your back” or “your arm” or “chest” or…

I thought I might include some of these overly wordy, sometime literary referenced, totally obtuse sentiments for your pleasure reading. Then, I thought, why?  For me, call me old fashioned, but I prefer the really simple, straightforward, and truly meaningful type of tattoo. Homage where homage is due.

If you really really need to know whose sporting what, you can google, or watch the Oscars.

In the meantime, what I really wonder about is what ‘fill in your celebrity’ was thinking during the moment of being inked. I suppose, though, if you can name your child Apple, Sailor Lee or Sage Moonblood (all real, not kidding) and not consider the consequences, you can do whatever else you want to your body parts.

Unless you don’t plan ever ever ever to age, have you considered what ultimately happens to that sharply defined piece of art you’d be sporting? Not the look you once thought you were going for, I imagine.

I, for one, know I’ll never get a tattoo.

You see, I don’t even wear T shirts with sayings on them.

Tattoo 3:1:10

After flipping through The New York Times Style Magazine section I’d like to share a couple of observations.

To begin, I was mesmerized by the almost, but not quite, Grouchoesque eyebrows arched, oh so gracefully, above the wide eyed gaze of the sweet young things.

Sweet young things still have eyebrows.

Mine have been disappearing at about the same rate as my facility to remember nouns. What to do?  Can you wield that angled, laced with powder, eyebrow brush? Right. Not many can. Besides the deep crevices that surround the eyebrow seem to catch and hold the powder. Not the smoky look I’m going for.

Or, the article about the latest in cosmetic surgery. Let’s consider the term “non invasive.” The description of this particular procedure started with the insertion of a “needle like device…tiny holes…injecting….molding.” Am I mincing words, here? Non invasive, to me, would mean being hypnotized into believing that I no longer have a slackened jaw.

Photo  My absolute, I can relate, portend of things to come, where can I buy that look, came in the editorial section called Jumble Fever. While just a mere consonant or two away from a politically incorrect sentiment, or a Spike Lee movie, here’s what emerged for me. Sometime, in the next 30 or so years, when I am certain that my fashion sense, along with my mind, are both circling the drain, I will, with arthritic finger, point to this saved and dog eared section for just this very moment.

Hmmm, the family will think, she is really fashion forward, afterall.

David Geffen? David Geffen!

Oh so sad. 

After 38 years of speculation, was it Mick, Warren, Cat (yeah, him) Kris? It appears that the truth comes out. And, purportedly, Carly Simon wrote the song because she was pissed that Mr Geffen was showing a tad too much interest in Joni Mitchell's career.

She could have sang, "he's so opportunistic" but it would have been challenging to make it work with "don't you, don't you…"

Other than Carly's long queried who is she talking/singing about, she and Joni Mitchell are the iconic voices of multiple generations. 

Living out loud. They both chronicled the lives, loves, aspirations, the reality/fragility of life. Mitchell's "Nothing Can Be Done" is a refrain in her song "Night Ride Home" which is about the resignation that comes with aging. And Carly, similarly, chronicled the demise of her marriage, then created an anthem for women in her "Coming Around Again"

Right up to the present, slugging it out with Starbucks for breach of contract. Apparently, like the rest of us Baby Boomers, according to the story, she too is struggling with funding her retirement.

Okay, perhaps a slight exaggeration. 

I, still, though had secretly wanted the fellow 'who walked into the party' to be an object of my fantasy, didn't you?

Wouldn’t you know it?

Put forth a fairly snarky epistle about beliefs, ponder whether there is a bigger plan for us, shy away from considering whether there actually is an all seeing, all knowing Being and then…

Reading palms 2:25:10An omen.

A zillion years ago, in a moment of abject curiosity I agreed to go see a friend’s psychic. “Why not,” she cajoled. “Why not?” I countered. “The fact that I catergorically, absolutely, positively don’t believe in this concept is in direct conflict with what if he says something really meaningful and profound?” “Get over yourself” was her wise counsel.

So there I found myself with Central Casting Psychic. Long caftan, shaved head, a meaningful relationship with Navajo jewelry.  He, clearly, took the chic part of psy chic very seriously. Understand this was not your neighborhood storefront variety. This was a hip and trendy upper west side Manhattan locale. 15th floor with a panoramic view of the Park. Either business was very good, and/or he really could foretell the future reaping the benefit of that from the ponies, Vegas or the stock market. Perhaps he just married well.

So, then what?

Not telling.

But yesterday, in the mail, came a card from him. “Now, it said, is the time to express our personal, spiritual, and creative power.” “Our”, I thought, is that an invitation to join him on the road to fame and fortune? Is this the royal “our”? Is there such a thing as the royal “our” or is only reserved for the royal “we”? Could I use more quotation marks?

Suffice it to say that I didn’t throw the card away. He’d know.

Are you, like me, conflicted as to what to say when asked "are you religious?"

Never quite sure exactly what I am being asked. I know it holds more gravitas than, "how are you?" But there as well, does the asker really want a multisentence response? Anyhow, I nod, sometimes with a beatific smile on my face, further emphasizing that I am, might be, must be, should be, want to be…. and respond that I am "spiritual".

Thankfully, no one ever asks exactly what that means. I, to be honest, really wouldn't be able to tell them.

I read today that the  Dalai Lama has a twitter account. Perhaps he can, in 140 characters or less, lend some insight to this age old question. Unless, of course you are getting all your conventional wisdom from Ashton Kutcher.

There does seem to be some scientific evidence, however, to support the truth behind the "laying on hands" concept making you feel supported and heard. Yet again, our old friend the hormone oxytocin is released, enabling a feeling of trust, and reducing stress. (Do need to find out if this is commercially available).

Anyhow, going forward, if you feel compelled to know the religious persuasion of someone, approach them with a reassuring touch, unless of course they are fingering beads and handing out pamphlets. 

 

I'm now thinking of taking lassoing lessons. 

Really.

Here's why.  I've decided that since I've undoubtedly exhausted perusing and pursuing the East Coast's middle aged male population I might as well move points West. 

Other than Yosemite Sam I can't think of a cowboy I haven't liked. Well, maybe I was a tad suspect of the Lone Ranger and Gene Autry, but basically the rest of them seem to be a pretty hunky, rugged group of guys. Roping, rustling, branding, what could be bad? And, do you think that there will be a cowboy, anytime soon, who having solidified the title of 'best rodeo rider ever ever' with corporate endorsements a plenty, will take his turn in the hay with every 'purty lil' thing' that sashays forth? And be contrite afterward? No siree bob.

But, I see a few obstacles.

Getting on a horse, for one. My height challenges extend to anything higher than a bench. I see this as somewhat problematic. Plus, I love having long endless, meandering, deeply involved, totally over the top conversations about just about anything. Yup and nope, I'm concerned, won't cut it. Plus I'd have to learn the two step, wouldn't I? 

I probably have some fringed vests tucked away somewhere, cowboy boots and a straw cowboy hat that, for a brief and fleeting moment, I thought might look good on the beach. All three of these looks didn't work for me the first go around, why would I think that they'd work now?

Finally, if Tom Robbins says that "Even Cowgirls Get The Blues" then maybe I should really rethink this.

Think I'll git along now. Yippee ki-ya. 

Cartoon images on aMusingBoomer are from Cartoonstock.com

About Me

Archives