Are there moments when you indulge yourself in a fairly robust fantasy life?

I do.

And I am here to tell you, that if I were to tell you, it would be way too much information. Except for this one.

Spying 2:8:10Double Agent. Actually, it could be singular agent. A spy. Undercover. Dark glasses and all.

But, as I think about it there are some caveats to consider. I am pretty clear I couldn’t buy into the trenchcoat wearing thing, for example. I really don’t look good in belted garments. Hats either. Frankly, it’s pretty hard to tuck in a head full of curly hair without looking somewhat like  Harpo Marx.

And heights. I am not so good with heights. They are, those spies, always slinking along a crevice, or running around on top of a moving train. Unless they provided a tether I really couldn’t preform that action either, could I?

Maybe I need to rethink this one.

Except, I really do like the potential accessories that one must have. Here’s one in development. Perhaps by the time it is perfected I will have shorn my locks, lipoed my waist and dealt with my phobias, all in time to don this thing. It’s a wrist top computer. And it works with gesture commands. It’s a bracelet that acts like a smartphone.  How cool how chic, how 007.

My new Bourne again identity.

An 'on line find your honey baby sweetie' Color Code Test?

A fifteen minute test that will give me a life-changing personal insight? Determine that I am a yellow, white, blue or red and then I will have real insights into my actions and how I relate to other personalities? 

And heretofore I based my entire being on thinking I am an autumn.

What will they think of next?

It must be pretty competitive out there, getting new members to sign up in 'find your honey baby sweetie' land. I, for one, would have preferred a gift with purchase…maybe some face cream, but I suppose, if they thought of this, they decided it just wasn't compelling enough. And, really, what would they have given the other female members?

I'm here to suggest that they offer the Kuder Preference Test. (For those not in the know, it's a test for career assessment and career planning).

So, if finding love, color coded or otherwise is challenging, perhaps a new career option isn't a bad second runner up plan.

 

That would be for those who are babyboomers. Or are the children of babyboomers. Or simply like alliteration.

These Boomers, you see, are playing video games, having sex and doing drugs. Not necessarily all at the same time.

But all this is qualified, verified and discussed, in great detail, by various and assorted government and research studies. At some point for scientists, I suspect, watching rats must get old.

Some personally significant highlights from Study A suggest that the heretofore Hair, Woodstock, Lucy in the Sky…Make Love Not War, aged folk who were smoking a bit of weed back then are still marijuana devotees. They have the distinction of being 'the group that never stopped, group'. 

Regardless of the dismal results for the decidedly middle aged in the 'meet your honey baby sweetie on line mating dance', studies showed that "individuals with strong, functioning sexual and intimate relationships will have better trajectories of health and well-being than those whose relationships function less well or who lack such relationships." One out of two isn't bad. If you really want to know what age group is doing what, to whom, and how often, read Study B.

Alrighty then, these Boomers are slightly buzzed, and purringly contented. Now what? Want to keep your mind sharp and age more gracefully? Buy yourself a Wii. Any loss of brain cells from the continuation of having a toke or two probably won't be rejuvenated, say these researchers but game playing seems to drive cognitive improvements. 

Is there some irony in the 60's mantra, courtesy of Timothy Leary, "tune in, turn on, drop out" now being relevant for the 60 something year old? Verified by research. Sex Drugs and Rock and Roll.

"Here's something really special, really important, I think you ought to know" she said. "Tell me" he replied, as he leaned far back into his chair, and folded his arms across his chest. 

Right you are. She changed her mind. Crossed her legs, shifted in her chair and asked him what he wanted to order for dinner.

The language of the body, it appears, is almost as important as the words that accompany it. Had he leaned forward, had his eyes widened expectantly, he would have struck the pose she was hoping for. 

Alas, not.

Abstract Thoughts? The Body Takes Them Literally  does not necessarily only relate to the language of love, but to a myriad of other postures indicating what we are thinking, if not outwardly verbalizing.

Want a more weighty, thoughtful answer to a question, have your respondent hold a heavy object. Want to evaluate a reaction to a moral transgression? Is the box of antiseptic wipes within reach? And more importantly, does the transgressor reach for one?

If this subtle body language stuff is really indicative of what you, or the person you are sitting with, is thinking, here are a couple of sure fire tests to determine how you're doing.

The job interview is winding down. "I am looking forward to meeting more of your team" you say. They shift in their chair, imperceptible as it seems, did they shift their body forward, a sure sign of thinking positively about the future, or not? 

Ditto for the blind date maneuver. Ten minutes into the coffee, the universal signal for 'check, please' occurs. Open for interpretation? Only if that gesture was in consort with playing footsie.

Talk too much date 1:28:10New to the ‘honey baby sweetie’ on line dating world?

It shows.

But you’ll learn, if the adage of old dogs new tricks is true.

In the meantime, here are a few things that you might want to internalize before you continue down the path toward eternal bliss.

Holding someone captive for a 45 minute soliloquy is fine if you are in your therapist’s office. They, after all, get paid. During a getting to know you meet and greet, not so much.

Empathy is a very attractive trait. “I understand, I see, I know, I’ve been there.” Expecting to hear those utterances after two, or more, tales of woe is probably pushing the envelop. Pick one. Bad divorce(s) or rotten kid(s). Not both.

Listen for breathing. If it is very very rhythmic chances are they have fallen asleep. If that is the case, best maneuver would be to, depending where this meet and greet is happening, either hang up, get the check, simply slip out.

A second go around is probably off the table anyhow.

Was Leonardo di Vinci a cross dresser?

The enigmatic smile, as well her identity, has baffled art historians for centuries.

Now, it appears, a group of Italian scientists are seeking permission to exhume di Vinci’s remains to conduct carbon and DNA testing. You see, theories have swirled about that the Mona Lisa was actually a self portrait. These scientists claim, if they have the opportunity to poke and prod his remains, they can dispel or prove this conundrum.

Goodness me.

Will the version of the song, made famous by Nat King Cole, have to be re-recorded? Monsieur Lisa, Monsieur Lisa, doesn’t have quite the same roll off your tongue rhythm, does it?

Was Salvador Dali’s rendition not his self portrait, simply his being prophetic?Self-portrait-as-mona-lisa-1614-mid

Will Dan Brown have continued fame and fortune by unraveling this mystery in another epic? Will Tom Hanks keep his hair long for the next installment? Did you, as I did, feel embarrassed for Tom’s wife, Rita Wilson, in her giggling, over the top, performance in “It’s Complicated”?

It will probably take another century before the French consider giving permission to the Italians to undertake this project.

Just as well. Leonardo rest in peace.

ElephanttutuCute, isn’t she? Makes you smile. At least it made me smile, when a friend sent it to me.

I don’t imagine, however, that it elicited quite the same response from the “meet your on line hopeful honey baby sweetie fellow” my friend had sent it to in response to his request for a full body photo. Amend that, for a recent, full body photo.

While Tom had Renee at Hello, apparently for the rest of the mating, dating, forever and ever crowd, the requirements are much more exacting.

“How did he make the request, and maintain some semblance of delicacy in doing so?” I asked. He wrote, she offered, “I normally don’t reply to emails with only one photo posted. Not that I get a flood of emails or that I consider myself a trophy. Just that that criterion has been a fairly reliable guide in the past—one which I have ignored to my great loss (of, time, travel and expenditure”).

Needless to say, she didn’t hear back from him.

Can’t really fault him for his request. Consider, really, the time, travel and expenditure consequences.

I did ask her how many hopefuls she responded to that either had no picture posted, or whose picture was, oh, how does one put this gracefully, scary? She agreed, somewhat sheepishly, that her shallow button was easily pressed, and regardless of the accompanying wonderfully written prose, she was apt to hit the delete, delete, and move onto the next.

He’s vindicated.

So now what?

Is it really the overworked, overused, beaten into submission request for chemistry at play here?

How’s about this branch of the science?

I think all the on line seekers of beauty and truth should take classes in the art of Alchemy. They can, if they are clever enough, learn how to transmute (like that word?) the base metals (hopefuls) into a more valuable and precious metal (a date) with a flick of a wand and some magical incantations. No photos required.

My understanding, familiarity, comprehension of the need for all the latest high tech gadgets has been chronicled here in better late than never. In a couple of words, huh and why?

But, we apparently need to have the newest and latest at our fingertips so we now have, ta da, the iPad. What does it do? What doesn't it do?

The pundits are pointing out that it doesn't have a camera, nor does Flash work on this device (this, I am told, is the ubiquitous software necessary for video and animation). Whatever that means. Reading more about it, it sounds to me that this new iPad phenomenon is basically a boom for the e book competition. 

It's the deliciously randy responses to this introduction that has me engaged. MadTV has, thus far, won for me the "best explanation for what we might want to do with this particular device." 

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lsjU0K8QPhs&w=425&h=344]

Work for you?

Never Larry David, of Curb Your Enthusiasm, and Seinfeld fame (in case you have been in a cave for the last decade) has a philosophy about this ‘let’s make a plan’ that most of us, I believe, would adopt if we dared.

Take, for example, this exchange.  “How’s about we get together?” Larry’s response would include the “why bother? We don’t really want to, we will email back and forth, ultimately make a date and then with certainty break it. So, no…let’s not.”

The rest of us make the date.

In the on line meet your honey, baby, sweetie world, making a plan takes herculean efforts. It’s rather an odd phenomenon as the goal of the on line meet your honey baby sweetie world is, oh my, to meet someone. If the act of having a date actually does occur, it is usually set up to happen as a drive by. A second scenario is a beverage of some sort, but preferably not something hot, as the time it takes to actually be able to swallow said liquid may be way more time than one wishes to devote to this activity. The third possible scenario is to plan a date and have dinner. This maneuver, I have come to learn, is usually made by the dating uninitiated. It is something they quickly realize they will never do again. See plan A.

One could adopt the electrician, plumber, contractor way of making a plan. You simply don’t call back. Alternatively, there is the cable or appliance repair person maneuver, which is to give it a day part window. “I’ll be over to pick you up between 12 and 6.

That works for you, doesn’t it?”

I am an unfortunate devotee to all the various and assorted articles I read that promise me a happier, healthier, better life if I follow their sage advice.

I don’t of course.

Sir Clement Freud, a British humorist, restaurateur, gambler said, “if you resolve to give up smoking, drinking and loving, you don’t actually live longer; it just seems longer.” Except, Sir Freud, for the smoking part.

Others, simply see a way to cash in on the life wisdom of others. Robyn Okrant followed the advice of Oprah, the patron saint of living life, for one year. Nothing particularly revolutionary came out of that experiment I understand, not even a visit with Oprah. Okay, maybe one insight. Not everyone can get away with leopard flats. Plus, I am particularly suspect of the motives of people who substitute a y for an i in their names.

So what’s with my subject heading, stand up?

It is for your benefit. Because I care. Because I worry. Because I am demonstrating that I can actually remember what I read.

Here goes. It seems that couch potatoes live shorter lives. Each daily hour of television watching was associated with an 18 percent increase in deaths. Four hours or more and you were 80 percent more likely to die of cardiovascular disease than those who watched two hours or less. With me, still? What I wondered was how do these researchers find the people who are willing to admit to their being slugs. Want to avoid the drastic outcome of this couch potato habit?

Here is the antidote. Watch your programs, but do so while standing up. Have weights in each of your hands, curling, lifting and curling some more, (this they caution is better for you than doing balance and toning exercises)…isn’t lifting weights toning?, anyway…do this for at least 2 hours a week. Your cognition, your ability to make decisions and to resolve conflicts improves.

I suspect the last benefit is because you have weights in your hands.

Alternatively, eat, drink and be merry…as you, no doubt, know the last line of that ditty.

Cartoon images on aMusingBoomer are from Cartoonstock.com

About Me

Archives