Distraction 12:13:09  I snapped to attention when reading Michelle Slatalla’s article in the Times The endless first chapter. I feared that I was the only one who knew, let alone would admit, that I can’t seem to get past the first five pages of any book I have been trying to read, lately.

Is it a correctable condition? Will I deteriorate into a smiling, nodding, but inarticulate participant at cocktail parties when folks regale each other with the latest literary adventure they are engaged in?

So, I undertook a mini research project, including Slatalla’s questioning of Dr. MaryAnne Wolf, to understand more about what was the reasons behind this current reality. Synthesizing it down to it’s most comprehensible level (like that sentence?) Dr. Wolf said, “We don’t have genes for reading.” (Well, that’s a relief looking at my relatives). “It’s an activity that we invented, and by doing it, we show that our brain has the capacity to go beyond itself…deduction, critical analysis, imagination, contemplation.” The net result, Wolf suggests, is keep trying to reengage, it will happen, you’ll start reading again.

Where was I?

Oh yeah, not focusing. Her suggestion, if you …fell off the reading wagon… pick yourself up, dust yourself off, and start all over again. Does this work for you? Sounds suspiciously like dieting.

So, it must have to do with my simply having TOO MUCH to do and therefore being simply too distracted to focus for any length of time.

Which somehow feels like much less of a character flaw than not reading. So I think I’ll stick with that excuse for now.

I've just learned that there is a message board for just about every conceivable, possible, imaginable topic.

Who knew?

Find a topic that interests you, type it into google and voila, there are a gazillion various and assorted thoughts spilling forth about whatever it is you just looked up. You sure can learn alot about what is on the minds of others. 

If you care.

Armed with this meaningless information then, today there were two topics of interest that required, I thought, further investigation.

One was the canceling of the longest running Soap, Guiding Light. It seems that Proctor and Gamble has opted out of the "soaps" (TV, that is…) and will no longer be playing that tune. 

So sad. An era ends.

Having never watched a soap in my life, mourning this loss eluded me. But, I knew, that there would be a reasonable number of angry viewers who would have something to say. 

For example "I am so upset that this show was canceled. I
have been watching for over 50 yrs since I was 8 yrs old. It is the
only show that I watch and I have seen the whole Bauer clan grow up and
even die." 

Or, "I must say, upon hearing the news about CBS
canceling GL,
I was in shock!! Although I have watched since about
1984, I do think the story lines have been ridiculous and/or boring for
the past couple of years. Luckily, I have always liked at least one
couple or storyline, so I kept watching – just fast-forwarded the dumb
parts."

Now these are loyal fans. Angry, pissed off, loyal fans. "Dumb parts" taking place over the course of someone's "42 years" of viewing. 

I haven't a point of view about what they were lamenting about, but I did understand what they were trying to say.

The second topic that was of interest to me was the "eddie." This is a surfing competition that honors Eddie Aikau, a lifeguard who lost his life at sea. An invitation only surfing competition is held in his honor, when waves reach a height of 30 feet, or more. This article attracted my attention as I am fascinated with the concept of someone, anyone, braving the ocean that is churning out waves over a foot.  I rarely venture forth into the surf, unless it is emulating a lake and is above 70 degrees. 

To the Eddie Aikau message board I went.

Here's one, "you kooks shut it or split. this thread is about stoke, aloha and the mana of surfing. STOKKKKKKKKKKKKKED!!!!!!!!!!!" Do you have ANY idea what that sentence means? 

Having no opinion of my own, I am now going to check out what others have to say about the "Global Warming Conference in Copenhagen, Tiger Woods latest indiscretion, and Lady Gaga meeting the Queen of England." 

I will post a message, on those message board sites,  if you care to know what I think.

What's your beverage of choice?

When in Italy, I, with the necessary flair and confidence, convinced I am fluent, order "una bottiglia d'acqua sensa gas per favore" an action that is simply what you do when dining there. Here, in New York, paying for my water seems unnecessary and expensive, so "tap water is fine, thank you" ordered with my decidedly nasal New Yawk accent.

Maybe, not so much, anymore. 

For it seems, according to the Times article Millions In U.S. drink dirty water  that the Safe Drinking Water Act has been violated. VIOLATED? That's pretty strong language when applied to our tap water. Don't you think?

Nonetheless, illegal concentrations of arsenic or radioactive substances, and dangerous bacteria found in sewage, is not what I had in mind when turning on my tap for a glass of water. 

Moderately comforting was the statement that in some cases water violations were one time events. This, of course, was negated with the statement that illegal contamination has persisted for years in other systems. I read that you could go to www.epa/gov/safewater/index.html which I dutifully did, to find out the quality of water in my area.

I couldn't figure out how to navigate the site to find the answer. 

So, I have made a decision going forward until I have clarity about the quality of my water.

I will only order wine. 

 

I am. I know it.

I read the Times article A FIrm Body, With No Workout Required  and, of course, immediately had to write something. That something is, you have got to be kidding!

So, the concept is that the shoe is designed to be instable (and, here I thought the word was unstable) but no matter…If you wish to remain upright and moving in a forward motion, you will have to tighten your gluts, flex your hamstrings, and use your calves so as to not fall flat on your possibly, if not probably, reconstructed face. And it's not for running, hopping, skipping, jumping…only walking.

Reebok made the claim of its effectiveness after testing this on 5 women. Like one more than 4.  No comment.

An exercise psychologist was asked her opinion about this latest phenomenon. "It will probably result in even more walking……." That's because, I surmise, having been foolish enough to buy the shoes, one would have to justify using them, which then "the implicit and explicit virtues endemic to exercise" kick in.

What will they think of next?

Buy a dog.

It has been correlated that people who have recently purchased a dog have shed weight and toned up. This, of course, only works if you buy a really "pull you down the street kinda big dog", not one of those little yappy things. Put on your "Not Your Daughter's Jeans" and you have now effectively shaped and toned your body into submission. 

Clearly, healthy diet and an exercise program are simply passe. Delusional and foolish. I think I'll try that plan.


I love it when friends shares their dating escapades with me.   

I listen raptly and attentively. What they wore, what they did, how they felt afterward. How they feel going forward. What he said, what she said. What the waiter said. What he said, but what he really meant by that, what she said, but really meant by that. 

Mostly I think, I must really be saner than I thought.

After hearing their stories I have made this observation and have come to this conclusion. 

It's dinner for 300.

It seems to me that when dating continues, let's say after the age of 40, this phenomenon is a constant. Because to the table is brought every relationship that has predated this encounter. And there they all sit. Piping up, making noises, asking for clarification, more information. 

Understand, this is happening, simultaneously, with the conversation that is going on between the two flesh and blood people at the table. 

I suspect, the hope they all harbor, is that slowly, over time, those uninvited guests will be dismissed, one by one, until only two people are left.

Nice.

Months back I commented about apps for phones. I was certain, at that time, if I could figure out how to access them, download them, retrieve them, etc. I would absolutely, certainly and surely make use of them.

I haven't yet. Okay, maybe one or two. Those revolve around finding a place to eat.

Now I've read about a new possibility for my iphone that wowed me. Sadly, I am sure that I absolutely, certainly and surely won't be able to use, either.

The reason is pretty simple. 

Take a listen to this. Incredilble, isn't it. I, having never mastered any instrument, ever, could say that I now play the iphone. Okay, maybe not. But I am floored by the minds of those who not only conceive of this possibility but go ahead and execute against it. Not so sure about the guy in the white suit, however.

After sharing this with a friend, I asked his thoughts. "Interesting," he said. "Interesting? That's it?" I said. "When it dispenses refreshments" he replied. "I'll be there."

And he's right. That works for me, too.

Feel compelled to move your own body fat around?  Here’s a pretty easy manuever. Put on a skirt, pants, girdle, or panty hose that is at least one size too small. Voila! Fats been relocated to your midriff.

Not the look you were going for, huh?

Help is on the way. Wanting that very same fat to migrate further north? Well then, get thee to a practitioner of the latest procedure, fat relocation.

Liposuction 12:3:09This is beyond scary stuff. The Society of Plastic Surgeons “reviewed the limited research on fat grafting to the breast and concluded that it can be considered a safe method of augmentation.” Not sure about you, but ‘limited research’ and ‘drawing a conclusion to proceed’, don’t seem to go together in a sentence that has ramifications on my health and well being.

Let’s consider one of the down sides of this procedure. Fat necrosis. I suppose we all want our fat to die and go away, not however while it is still in our body.

So while the two for one concept is appealing to some, “slim the thighs enhance your chest” oh and, by the way, while you are in the neighborhood, puff up your cheeks and lips (guess that would make it a four ‘fer’) I think, for now,  I’ll take a pass.

Let's see. 

Stretch your mind, stretch your budget. Check. Stretch your imagination, stretch the truth. Check. Stretch your hams, run faster. Uncheck.

Now, weren't you surprised? 

I was. 

I stopped running years ago. Bending over to tie my sneakers, I thought, was sufficient enough to constitute stretching.  Who knew that it actually was as much as I needed to do. Go me.

Or not.

The article How Necessary Is Stretching seemed to provoke, more than clarify, what one should do. Will I be injured if I don't?  Will I be a more efficient athlete if I do? Will I meet and marry the man of my dreams?

More questions than answers, it appeared based on reading the comments that trailed the article.

It seems to me that the whole ritual one does before and after exercising, not knowing whether it is good for you or not, does provoke a "boy, am I a good person" feeling. Earnestness of purpose, seriousness about the intention, prolonging having to begin, are all valid reasons.

It appears that I can handily demonstrate my "flexibility" by being easily swayed to change a plan. Other than that, not so much.

Tina. One of the most recognizable icons of the music industry. Recognizable to me, that is, when I saw her image at the extraordinary exhibit Who Shot Rock and Roll  at the Brooklyn Museum.

WhoShotRock_335X335

Let’s revisit recognizable.

Ariella Budick of the Financial Times suggested, if I understood her correctly, that “the images mean very little if you don’t recognize the musicians they depict.”

Beg to differ.

I know the words to a million songs. I can’t tell you who, however, save a very few performers, recorded it. Does it matter?

We gaze at art, not always able to recall the artist’s name. We talk about books read, may not be able to recall the author’s name. Does not lessen the impact of what we have seen or read. The hell with Ariella.

A youngish couple were moving along at the same pace I was and provided, happily for me, a few bars of the songs associated with each of the artists. I alternatively, was able to provide a bit of historical prospective about life before sound waves.

Kidding.

 

 

A lovely concept. 

Cooing softly into the ear of a loved one. A good time is right before you both nod off for the night. Let your partner know how happy, contented and serene you are feeling. Often, and over and over, serene and happy.  Coo away, even once they have drifted off. Maybe it would be a good time to mention something you've been wanting. Wanting a lot.

Why?

Because scientists have recently determined that auditory cues prior to sleeping increase memory.

This particular study didn't exactly have the findings that I had hoped for. At least not at this point. 

You see, they are linking getting a good night's sleep to memory making and reinforcing. What's a good nights sleep? Particularly when you are lying there, wide awake, trying to recall where you left your keys. 

I imagine the moral of the story for those of us who are clear that we can't remember anything is to talk, aloud, clearly to ourselves, as we negotiate through our day. "I am now putting my keys on the desk." This would be followed by shaking your keys vigorously. "Tomorrow I need to go to the supermarket." Mooing, clucking and oinking might help prompt what was on your shopping list. The list that, no doubt, you will invariably leave at home.

So, take an Ambien, turn off the light, one last key rattling and oink and rest assured that you might, in the morning, find your keys, to drive your car to your local supermarket, and buy what you need.

And if the aforementioned cooing to your partner worked, find a gift when you return home.

Cartoon images on aMusingBoomer are from Cartoonstock.com

About Me

Archives